Mountain Home School District |
| April
18, 2008 Open letter to the Mountain Home School Board, members of CARE, and others who voted in favor of the school millage increase: The April 8th election results have now been certified, and the numbers show that your side won. Your victory was a real squeaker, though those extra 69 out of 6,393 total votes (about 1.1%) gave you an edge, not a clear mandate from the electorate. A number of people have asked us to request a recount, but because we trust in the sanctity of the ballot box, and were witnesses to the final vote tally at the courthouse, we will not contest the outcome of this election. But BCFT will be watching. We will watch the expenditures connected with this new bond issue very carefully, and question anything that appears to be out of line. We will inquire from time to time how much excess tax revenue the new millage has generated, and ask again that this excess be used to reduce the districts debt. We will conduct random inspections of known structural problem spots and insist that prompt action be taken to correct those deficiencies. Once the first five years of the new bond contract have passed, and extra principal payments are allowed, we will expect whoever is sitting on the school board at that time to make those extra payments to retire the debt early. There is no question that it is important to look toward, and plan for, the future but it must be done responsibly, both fiscally and morally. Our challenge to you as you move forward is to remember just how close this vote really was: almost as many people were against it as were for it. Let this realization help you choose the path to follow. Here are a few other things to keep in mind:
Bottom line? The voters have spoken, and we accept their verdict. While BCFT is undeniably disappointed at the outcome of this election, we take great pride in knowing that our involvement increased awareness of the issue and motivated record numbers of voters to turn out at the polls. Sincerely, Frank & Suzan Kaye |
Mountain Home School
District |
||
| Issue | Votes | Percentage |
6.87 mills school tax levy existing 3.92 mills For |
|
|
In the end the margin was close, just 69 votes, but a record turnout yesterday of Mountain Home School District voters resulted in a revised 2.95 mill tax proposal being approved to finance a $34.2 million dollar building and renovation program. The final, but unofficial tally, had 3,231 voting in favor and 3,162 opposed. Percentage wise it was 50.54 percent in favor, 49.46 against. Seven months ago district voters soundly rejected by a 64 to 36 percent margin a 3.75 mill increase to finance the most comprehensive building program in district history. That issue failed to carry any voting precincts with a then record 26 percent casting ballots. Yesterday, nearly 28 percent of the eligible voters turned out and the amended proposal, using a strong showing at Mountain Home voting precincts, carried in seven of the 14 precincts. The approval, which also includes refinancing of a 2003 bond issue, allows the district to issue just over $41 million dollars in bonds to finance a number of projects with the key element being a new $18 million dollar elementary school to house grades 3, 4 and 5 taking pressure off three other schools. It also keeps the district from having to look at possibly cutting programs to finance state facility requirements.
Grassroots support lifts
MH millage plan, superintendent says Mountain Home School Superintendent Charles Scriber says the margin of victory was small in yesterday's school tax election, but the win by 69 votes was big for the district's students and residents. What made the difference seven months after voters crushed a larger millage plan? Scriber said the school board responded with a scaled-back construction and renovation plan funded by a smaller tax increase. He also cited vocal and active citizen support. We had many, many people helping us and supporting us and out there putting up signs and talking to people, calling people. We had just a grass-roots effort that really helped us put us over the top. It was very close and now we know that every vote counts. Scriber thanked the plan's supporters, including district employees, parents, the school board, the Mountain Home chamber leadership group, and the Citizens for Alliance for Responsible Education or CARE, a local group formed in support the proposal. School Board President Bob Byrd also cited CARE's impact. The CARE organization really stepped in and gave our arguments some credibility. You know, we went through the first process with the board and the administration trying to get these points across and when we got the community involved, I think it gave a feeling of credibility and believability over what was being said about us. CARE fundraising chairman Mike Stockton said he was amazed at the turnaround victory compared to the overwhelming defeat of the previous proposal. Stockton said CARE had influence with voters because its members represent a cross-section of the community. This wasnt a partisan issue. It wasnt a Democrat versus Republican. It wasnt a rich versus poor. It wasnt a retiree versus a non-retiree. This was a community issue, and we were representing the community. And so, I think its just natural that that got hurt. The Baxter County Friends of the Taxpayers opposed the plan. The organization was also against the district's previous tax proposal. Frank Kaye is the group's director. Were disappointed that we had such a turnaround. But the voters have spoken and thats what makes this country great. We all get a chance to say what we want to say, and we get a chance to vote on what we believe in."
School bond issue passes A special school election to fund a $34.25 million construction project for the Mountain Home School District passed by an unofficial margin of 69 votes Tuesday night. A similar larger construction project and tax proposal failed by 1,683 votes last September. Mountain Home Schools Superintendent Dr. Charles Scriber called the outcome a "red letter day" for the school district. Scriber credited the school board for bringing voters around in favor of the project through the board's willingness to downsize the project. He said a grassroots effort in support of the construction plan led by the Citizens Alliance for Responsible Education was also instrumental in turning voter sentiment around. District employees were onboard, too, Scriber said. |